Conclusion
CONCLUSION
What we have described is not the pure libertarianism of anarcho-capitalists. Nor is it the tepid liberalism of social democrats who believe themselves moderate.
This is Libertarian Libertarianism—constitutionally locked, democratically continuous.
Solidarity without spoliation: neither dependent, nor abandoned.
A system where the State does what only it can do, and nothing else.
Where public money is constrained by intangible rules, with two distinct funds for prudence and recovery.
Where currency is disciplined by competition.
Where the flat tax replaces the fiscal maze: a single rate, visible, without hidden VAT.
Where social protection exists, but through the market—health insurance, unemployment, education—and self-financed Autonomous Communities.
Where the citizen controls their elected officials continuously, in the recall booth, not once every five years.
Where vote secrecy is preserved by anonymous architecture, with no link between card number and identity.
Where the black vote blocks, the white vote counterbalances, the gray vote abstains, and sabotage has a cost.
Where political weight reflects real contribution.
Where fundamental rights are protected by an egalitarian chamber that does not govern.
Where budgetary decisions and government depend on a censitary chamber, more stable by design.
Where raising taxes is difficult (2/3 of those who pay) and lowering them easier (2/3 egalitarian).
Where judges are elected by the people, by equal suffrage, and protected by long terms.
Where immigration is managed according to its nature: economic quotas by Parliament, fundamental rights by Senate.
Where the framework is guarded by a four-body institution, public, balanced, procedural.
Where no international treaty overrides the will of the people.
Where referendum decides—by equal or weighted suffrage depending on the nature of the question—and where its result is binding.
Where political parties are themselves democratic, on pain of losing their accreditation.
Where elected officials earn in proportion to their legitimacy, and can only raise their own pay with the people’s agreement.
Where risks are encapsulated: each domain can fail without contaminating the others.
Where Autonomous Communities offer a self-financed safety net: communities of work and life, diverse, voluntary, where one can get back on one’s feet or choose to live.
This is neither utopia nor weak compromise. This is the architecture of sovereign freedom. This is Libertarian Libertarianism.
A framework, not a straitjacket
This document has deliberately presented, in several places, multiple options for the same problem. Local governance, chamber organization, voting modalities: alternatives coexist in these pages.
This plurality is not hesitation. It is an assumed choice of flexibility. The principles are firm—whoever pays decides, but not everything; civic equality for rights, contributory logic for money; freedom to enter, freedom to exit. The architectures, on the other hand, can vary.
Context will decide: territory size, political culture, social acceptability, available means. This text frames without imposing. It offers a coherent catalog of options, not a fixed model.
For the curious who want to go deeper: monetary competition comes from Friedrich Hayek [1]. Budgetary constitutionalism is the work of James Buchanan and the Public Choice school [2]. Liberal pragmatism follows in the lineage of Milton Friedman [3]. Brutal adjustment in times of crisis is defended by the Austrian school [4][5]. Weighted censitary voting revives an idea from 19th-century classical liberalism [7][8]. The flat tax is defended by many liberal economists [3]. Liquid democracy was theorized by the German Pirate movement in the 2010s. Citizen sortition draws from Athenian democracy and contemporary work on deliberative democracy. The anonymous voter card draws inspiration from Estonian electronic voting systems, corrected for their flaws. Judicial elections exist in several American states. The anti-blocking mechanism (budget -10%, recovery fund), chambers/taxation asymmetry, Parliament/Senate immigration division, risk encapsulation, and Autonomous Communities are innovations specific to this document.
The synthesis—Libertarian Libertarianism—is new.